A Study on Large Language Models' Limitations in Multiple-Choice Question Answering

Aisha Khatun, Daniel G. Brown
1/15/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has become commonplace, particularly with the emergence of open-source models. More importantly, smaller models are well-suited for integration into consumer devices and are frequently employed either as standalone solutions or as subroutines in various AI tasks. Despite their ubiquitous use, there is no systematic analysis of their specific capabilities and limitations. In this study, we tackle one of the most widely used tasks - answering Multiple Choice Question (MCQ). We analyze 26 small open-source models and find that 65% of the models do not understand the task, only 4 models properly select an answer from the given choices, and only 5 of these models are choice order independent. These results are rather alarming given the extensive use of MCQ tests with these models. We recommend exercising caution and testing task understanding before using MCQ to evaluate LLMs in any field whatsoever.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{khatun2024study,
  title  = {A Study on Large Language Models' Limitations in Multiple-Choice Question Answering},
  author = {Aisha Khatun and Daniel G. Brown},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2401.07955},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07955v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2401.07955.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2401.07955)

Discussion