Uncertainty estimates for semantic segmentation: providing enhanced reliability for automated motor claims handling

Jan Küchler, Daniel Kröll, Sebastian Schoenen, Andreas Witte
1/17/2024
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Deep neural network models for image segmentation can be a powerful tool for the automation of motor claims handling processes in the insurance industry. A crucial aspect is the reliability of the model outputs when facing adverse conditions, such as low quality photos taken by claimants to document damages. We explore the use of a meta-classification model to empirically assess the precision of segments predicted by a model trained for the semantic segmentation of car body parts. Different sets of features correlated with the quality of a segment are compared, and an AUROC score of 0.915 is achieved for distinguishing between high- and low-quality segments. By removing low-quality segments, the average mIoU of the segmentation output is improved by 16 percentage points and the number of wrongly predicted segments is reduced by 77%.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kchler2024uncertainty,
  title  = {Uncertainty estimates for semantic segmentation: providing enhanced reliability for automated motor claims handling},
  author = {Jan Küchler and Daniel Kröll and Sebastian Schoenen and Andreas Witte},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2401.09245},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.09245v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2401.09245.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2401.09245)

Discussion