Towards providing reliable job completion time predictions using PCS

Abdullah Bin Faisal, Noah Martin, Hafiz Mohsin Bashir, Swaminathan Lamelas, Fahad R. Dogar
1/18/2024
cs.DCcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: abdullahfsm/PCS (5 stars, MIT, last commit 2026-04-16).

Abstract

In this paper we build a case for providing job completion time predictions to cloud users, similar to the delivery date of a package or arrival time of a booked ride. Our analysis reveals that providing predictability can come at the expense of performance and fairness. Existing cloud scheduling systems optimize for extreme points in the trade-off space, making them either extremely unpredictable or impractical. To address this challenge, we present PCS, a new scheduling framework that aims to provide predictability while balancing other traditional objectives. The key idea behind PCS is to use Weighted-Fair-Queueing (WFQ) and find a suitable configuration of different WFQ parameters (e.g., class weights) that meets specific goals for predictability. It uses a simulation-aided search strategy, to efficiently discover WFQ configurations that lie on the Pareto front of the trade-off space between these objectives. We implement and evaluate PCS in the context of DNN job scheduling on GPUs. Our evaluation, on a small scale GPU testbed and larger-scale simulations, shows that PCS can provide accurate completion time estimates while marginally compromising on performance and fairness.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

abdullahfsm/PCSCommunity100%
MIT
50C, C++Jan 18, 20246 months agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{faisal2024towards,
  title  = {Towards providing reliable job completion time predictions using PCS},
  author = {Abdullah Bin Faisal and Noah Martin and Hafiz Mohsin Bashir and Swaminathan Lamelas and Fahad R. Dogar},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2401.10354},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10354v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2401.10354.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2401.10354)

Discussion