Can A Cognitive Architecture Fundamentally Enhance LLMs? Or Vice Versa?

Ron Sun
1/19/2024
cs.AIcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The paper discusses what is needed to address the limitations of current LLM-centered AI systems. The paper argues that incorporating insights from human cognition and psychology, as embodied by a computational cognitive architecture, can help develop systems that are more capable, more reliable, and more human-like. It emphasizes the importance of the dual-process architecture and the hybrid neuro-symbolic approach in addressing the limitations of current LLMs. In the opposite direction, the paper also highlights the need for an overhaul of computational cognitive architectures to better reflect advances in AI and computing technology. Overall, the paper advocates for a multidisciplinary, mutually beneficial approach towards developing better models both for AI and for understanding the human mind.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sun2024cognitive,
  title  = {Can A Cognitive Architecture Fundamentally Enhance LLMs? Or Vice Versa?},
  author = {Ron Sun},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2401.10444},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10444v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2401.10444.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2401.10444)

Discussion