Improving Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Efficient Reward Model Ensemble

Shun Zhang, Zhenfang Chen, Sunli Chen, Yikang Shen, Zhiqing Sun +1 more
1/30/2024
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a widely adopted approach for aligning large language models with human values. However, RLHF relies on a reward model that is trained with a limited amount of human preference data, which could lead to inaccurate predictions. As a result, RLHF may produce outputs that are misaligned with human values. To mitigate this issue, we contribute a reward ensemble method that allows the reward model to make more accurate predictions. As using an ensemble of large language model-based reward models can be computationally and resource-expensive, we explore efficient ensemble methods including linear-layer ensemble and LoRA-based ensemble. Empirically, we run Best-of-$n$ and Proximal Policy Optimization with our ensembled reward models, and verify that our ensemble methods help improve the alignment performance of RLHF outputs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2024improving,
  title  = {Improving Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Efficient Reward Model Ensemble},
  author = {Shun Zhang and Zhenfang Chen and Sunli Chen and Yikang Shen and Zhiqing Sun and Chuang Gan},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2401.16635},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16635v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2401.16635.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2401.16635)

Discussion