Detecting LLM-assisted writing in scientific communication: Are we there yet?

Teddy Lazebnik, Ariel Rosenfeld
1/30/2024
cs.IRcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs), exemplified by ChatGPT, have significantly reshaped text generation, particularly in the realm of writing assistance. While ethical considerations underscore the importance of transparently acknowledging LLM use, especially in scientific communication, genuine acknowledgment remains infrequent. A potential avenue to encourage accurate acknowledging of LLM-assisted writing involves employing automated detectors. Our evaluation of four cutting-edge LLM-generated text detectors reveals their suboptimal performance compared to a simple ad-hoc detector designed to identify abrupt writing style changes around the time of LLM proliferation. We contend that the development of specialized detectors exclusively dedicated to LLM-assisted writing detection is necessary. Such detectors could play a crucial role in fostering more authentic recognition of LLM involvement in scientific communication, addressing the current challenges in acknowledgment practices.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lazebnik2024detecting,
  title  = {Detecting LLM-assisted writing in scientific communication: Are we there yet?},
  author = {Teddy Lazebnik and Ariel Rosenfeld},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2401.16807},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16807v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2401.16807.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2401.16807)

Discussion