Hierarchical Integral Probability Metrics: A distance on random probability measures with low sample complexity

Marta Catalano, Hugo Lavenant
2/12/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Random probabilities are a key component to many nonparametric methods in Statistics and Machine Learning. To quantify comparisons between different laws of random probabilities several works are starting to use the elegant Wasserstein over Wasserstein distance. In this paper we prove that the infinite dimensionality of the space of probabilities drastically deteriorates its sample complexity, which is slower than any polynomial rate in the sample size. We propose a new distance that preserves many desirable properties of the former while achieving a parametric rate of convergence. In particular, our distance 1) metrizes weak convergence; 2) can be estimated numerically through samples with low complexity; 3) can be bounded analytically from above and below. The main ingredient are integral probability metrics, which lead to the name hierarchical IPM.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{catalano2026hierarchical,
  title  = {Hierarchical Integral Probability Metrics: A distance on random probability measures with low sample complexity},
  author = {Marta Catalano and Hugo Lavenant},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2402.00423},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00423},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.00423.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.00423)

Discussion