Homogenization Effects of Large Language Models on Human Creative Ideation

Barrett R. Anderson, Jash Hemant Shah, Max Kreminski
2/2/2024
cs.HCcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are now being used in a wide variety of contexts, including as creativity support tools (CSTs) intended to help their users come up with new ideas. But do LLMs actually support user creativity? We hypothesized that the use of an LLM as a CST might make the LLM's users feel more creative, and even broaden the range of ideas suggested by each individual user, but also homogenize the ideas suggested by different users. We conducted a 36-participant comparative user study and found, in accordance with the homogenization hypothesis, that different users tended to produce less semantically distinct ideas with ChatGPT than with an alternative CST. Additionally, ChatGPT users generated a greater number of more detailed ideas, but felt less responsible for the ideas they generated. We discuss potential implications of these findings for users, designers, and developers of LLM-based CSTs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{anderson2024homogenization,
  title  = {Homogenization Effects of Large Language Models on Human Creative Ideation},
  author = {Barrett R. Anderson and Jash Hemant Shah and Max Kreminski},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.01536},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01536v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.01536.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.01536)

Discussion