Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspective

Pratik Rathore, Weimu Lei, Zachary Frangella, Lu Lu, Madeleine Udell
2/2/2024
cs.LGmath.OCstat.ML

No official code found. Best implementation: pratikrathore8/opt_for_pinns (45 stars, last commit 2025-03-04).

Abstract

This paper explores challenges in training Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), emphasizing the role of the loss landscape in the training process. We examine difficulties in minimizing the PINN loss function, particularly due to ill-conditioning caused by differential operators in the residual term. We compare gradient-based optimizers Adam, L-BFGS, and their combination Adam+L-BFGS, showing the superiority of Adam+L-BFGS, and introduce a novel second-order optimizer, NysNewton-CG (NNCG), which significantly improves PINN performance. Theoretically, our work elucidates the connection between ill-conditioned differential operators and ill-conditioning in the PINN loss and shows the benefits of combining first- and second-order optimization methods. Our work presents valuable insights and more powerful optimization strategies for training PINNs, which could improve the utility of PINNs for solving difficult partial differential equations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

4510Shell, PythonSep 26, 20231 years ago

Cite this paper

@article{rathore2024challenges,
  title  = {Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspective},
  author = {Pratik Rathore and Weimu Lei and Zachary Frangella and Lu Lu and Madeleine Udell},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.01868},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01868v2},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.01868.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.01868)

Discussion