Robust Counterfactual Explanations in Machine Learning: A Survey

Junqi Jiang, Francesco Leofante, Antonio Rago, Francesca Toni
2/2/2024
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Counterfactual explanations (CEs) are advocated as being ideally suited to providing algorithmic recourse for subjects affected by the predictions of machine learning models. While CEs can be beneficial to affected individuals, recent work has exposed severe issues related to the robustness of state-of-the-art methods for obtaining CEs. Since a lack of robustness may compromise the validity of CEs, techniques to mitigate this risk are in order. In this survey, we review works in the rapidly growing area of robust CEs and perform an in-depth analysis of the forms of robustness they consider. We also discuss existing solutions and their limitations, providing a solid foundation for future developments.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jiang2024robust,
  title  = {Robust Counterfactual Explanations in Machine Learning: A Survey},
  author = {Junqi Jiang and Francesco Leofante and Antonio Rago and Francesca Toni},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.01928},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01928v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.01928.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.01928)

Discussion