A Survey of Constraint Formulations in Safe Reinforcement Learning

Akifumi Wachi, Xun Shen, Yanan Sui
2/3/2024
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Safety is critical when applying reinforcement learning (RL) to real-world problems. As a result, safe RL has emerged as a fundamental and powerful paradigm for optimizing an agent's policy while incorporating notions of safety. A prevalent safe RL approach is based on a constrained criterion, which seeks to maximize the expected cumulative reward subject to specific safety constraints. Despite recent effort to enhance safety in RL, a systematic understanding of the field remains difficult. This challenge stems from the diversity of constraint representations and little exploration of their interrelations. To bridge this knowledge gap, we present a comprehensive review of representative constraint formulations, along with a curated selection of algorithms designed specifically for each formulation. In addition, we elucidate the theoretical underpinnings that reveal the mathematical mutual relations among common problem formulations. We conclude with a discussion of the current state and future directions of safe reinforcement learning research.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wachi2024survey,
  title  = {A Survey of Constraint Formulations in Safe Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Akifumi Wachi and Xun Shen and Yanan Sui},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.02025},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02025v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.02025.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.02025)

Discussion