On the Role of Initialization on the Implicit Bias in Deep Linear Networks

Oria Gruber, Haim Avron
2/4/2024
cs.LGmath.NA

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Despite Deep Learning's (DL) empirical success, our theoretical understanding of its efficacy remains limited. One notable paradox is that while conventional wisdom discourages perfect data fitting, deep neural networks are designed to do just that, yet they generalize effectively. This study focuses on exploring this phenomenon attributed to the implicit bias at play. Various sources of implicit bias have been identified, such as step size, weight initialization, optimization algorithm, and number of parameters. In this work, we focus on investigating the implicit bias originating from weight initialization. To this end, we examine the problem of solving underdetermined linear systems in various contexts, scrutinizing the impact of initialization on the implicit regularization when using deep networks to solve such systems. Our findings elucidate the role of initialization in the optimization and generalization paradoxes, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of DL's performance characteristics.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gruber2024role,
  title  = {On the Role of Initialization on the Implicit Bias in Deep Linear Networks},
  author = {Oria Gruber and Haim Avron},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.02454},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02454v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.02454.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.02454)

Discussion