Weisfeiler Leman for Euclidean Equivariant Machine Learning

Snir Hordan, Tal Amir, Nadav Dym
2/4/2024
cs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: IntelliFinder/welnet (3 stars, last commit 2024-06-09).

Abstract

The $k$-Weisfeiler-Leman ($k$-WL) graph isomorphism test hierarchy is a common method for assessing the expressive power of graph neural networks (GNNs). Recently, GNNs whose expressive power is equivalent to the $2$-WL test were proven to be universal on weighted graphs which encode $3\mathrm{D}$ point cloud data, yet this result is limited to invariant continuous functions on point clouds. In this paper, we extend this result in three ways: Firstly, we show that PPGN can simulate $2$-WL uniformly on all point clouds with low complexity. Secondly, we show that $2$-WL tests can be extended to point clouds which include both positions and velocities, a scenario often encountered in applications. Finally, we provide a general framework for proving equivariant universality and leverage it to prove that a simple modification of this invariant PPGN architecture can be used to obtain a universal equivariant architecture that can approximate all continuous equivariant functions uniformly. Building on our results, we develop our WeLNet architecture, which sets new state-of-the-art results on the N-Body dynamics task and the GEOM-QM9 molecular conformation generation task.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

welnet works on GEOM-QM9

30Shell, PythonJan 21, 20242 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hordan2024weisfeiler,
  title  = {Weisfeiler Leman for Euclidean Equivariant Machine Learning},
  author = {Snir Hordan and Tal Amir and Nadav Dym},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.02484},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02484v3},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.02484.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.02484)

Discussion