Position: Rethinking Explainable Machine Learning as Applied Statistics

Sebastian Bordt, Eric Raidl, U. V. Luxburg
2/12/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

In the rapidly growing literature on explanation algorithms, it often remains unclear what precisely these algorithms are for and how they should be used. In this position paper, we argue for a novel and pragmatic perspective: Explainable machine learning needs to recognize its parallels with applied statistics. Concretely, explanations are statistics of high-dimensional functions, and we should think about them analogously to traditional statistical quantities. Among others, this implies that we must think carefully about the matter of interpretation, or how the explanations relate to intuitive questions that humans have about the world. The fact that this is scarcely being discussed in research papers is one of the main drawbacks of the current literature. Moving forward, the analogy between explainable machine learning and applied statistics suggests fruitful ways for how research practices can be improved.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{bordt2026position,
  title  = {Position: Rethinking Explainable Machine Learning as Applied Statistics},
  author = {Sebastian Bordt and Eric Raidl and U. V. Luxburg},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2402.02870},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.02870},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.02870.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.02870)

Discussion