Reducing the Cost of Quantum Chemical Data By Backpropagating Through Density Functional Theory

Alexander Mathiasen, Hatem Helal, Paul Balanca, Adam Krzywaniak, Ali Parviz +4 more
2/6/2024
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Density Functional Theory (DFT) accurately predicts the quantum chemical properties of molecules, but scales as $O(N_{\text{electrons}}^3)$. Schütt et al. (2019) successfully approximate DFT 1000x faster with Neural Networks (NN). Arguably, the biggest problem one faces when scaling to larger molecules is the cost of DFT labels. For example, it took years to create the PCQ dataset (Nakata & Shimazaki, 2017) on which subsequent NNs are trained within a week. DFT labels molecules by minimizing energy $E(\cdot )$ as a "loss function." We bypass dataset creation by directly training NNs with $E(\cdot )$ as a loss function. For comparison, Schütt et al. (2019) spent 626 hours creating a dataset on which they trained their NN for 160h, for a total of 786h; our method achieves comparable performance within 31h.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mathiasen2024reducing,
  title  = {Reducing the Cost of Quantum Chemical Data By Backpropagating Through Density Functional Theory},
  author = {Alexander Mathiasen and Hatem Helal and Paul Balanca and Adam Krzywaniak and Ali Parviz and Frederik Hvilshøj and Blazej Banaszewski and Carlo Luschi and Andrew William Fitzgibbon},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.04030},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04030v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.04030.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.04030)

Discussion