Fairness of Exposure in Online Restless Multi-armed Bandits

Archit Sood, Shweta Jain, Sujit Gujar
2/9/2024
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Restless multi-armed bandits (RMABs) generalize the multi-armed bandits where each arm exhibits Markovian behavior and transitions according to their transition dynamics. Solutions to RMAB exist for both offline and online cases. However, they do not consider the distribution of pulls among the arms. Studies have shown that optimal policies lead to unfairness, where some arms are not exposed enough. Existing works in fairness in RMABs focus heavily on the offline case, which diminishes their application in real-world scenarios where the environment is largely unknown. In the online scenario, we propose the first fair RMAB framework, where each arm receives pulls in proportion to its merit. We define the merit of an arm as a function of its stationary reward distribution. We prove that our algorithm achieves sublinear fairness regret in the single pull case $O(\sqrt{T\ln T})$, with $T$ being the total number of episodes. Empirically, we show that our algorithm performs well in the multi-pull scenario as well.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sood2024fairness,
  title  = {Fairness of Exposure in Online Restless Multi-armed Bandits},
  author = {Archit Sood and Shweta Jain and Sujit Gujar},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.06348},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06348v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.06348.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.06348)

Discussion