Evaluation Metrics for Automated Typographic Poster Generation

Sérgio M. Rebelo, J. J. Merelo, João Bicker, Penousal Machado
2/10/2024
cs.MMcs.AIcs.HC

No official code found. Best implementation: sergiomrebelo/evo-poster (5 stars, MIT, last commit 2024-03-29).

Abstract

Computational Design approaches facilitate the generation of typographic design, but evaluating these designs remains a challenging task. In this paper, we propose a set of heuristic metrics for typographic design evaluation, focusing on their legibility, which assesses the text visibility, aesthetics, which evaluates the visual quality of the design, and semantic features, which estimate how effectively the design conveys the content semantics. We experiment with a constrained evolutionary approach for generating typographic posters, incorporating the proposed evaluation metrics with varied setups, and treating the legibility metrics as constraints. We also integrate emotion recognition to identify text semantics automatically and analyse the performance of the approach and the visual characteristics outputs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT

The Evolutionary Poster Composer (evo-poster) is a generative poster design system. From a given content (including text and imagery), evo-poster can generate and evolve poster designs considerating the aesthetic and semantics features of the content.

50CSS, HTMLNov 11, 20222 years agoMIT
computational-creativitycomputational-designevolutionary-algorithmsevolutionary-artgenerative-design+2 more

Cite this paper

@article{rebelo2024evaluation,
  title  = {Evaluation Metrics for Automated Typographic Poster Generation},
  author = {Sérgio M. Rebelo and J. J. Merelo and João Bicker and Penousal Machado},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.06945},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06945v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.06945.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.06945)

Discussion