Collaborative Learning with Different Labeling Functions

Yuyang Deng, Mingda Qiao
2/12/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

We study a variant of Collaborative PAC Learning, in which we aim to learn an accurate classifier for each of the $n$ data distributions, while minimizing the number of samples drawn from them in total. Unlike in the usual collaborative learning setup, it is not assumed that there exists a single classifier that is simultaneously accurate for all distributions. We show that, when the data distributions satisfy a weaker realizability assumption, which appeared in [Crammer and Mansour, 2012] in the context of multi-task learning, sample-efficient learning is still feasible. We give a learning algorithm based on Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) on a natural augmentation of the hypothesis class, and the analysis relies on an upper bound on the VC dimension of this augmented class. In terms of the computational efficiency, we show that ERM on the augmented hypothesis class is NP-hard, which gives evidence against the existence of computationally efficient learners in general. On the positive side, for two special cases, we give learners that are both sample- and computationally-efficient.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{deng2026collaborative,
  title  = {Collaborative Learning with Different Labeling Functions},
  author = {Yuyang Deng and Mingda Qiao},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2402.10445},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10445},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.10445.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.10445)

Discussion