EvoGrad: A Dynamic Take on the Winograd Schema Challenge with Human Adversaries

Jing Han Sun, Ali Emami
2/20/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at the Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC), a coreference resolution task testing common-sense reasoning through pronoun disambiguation, they struggle with instances that feature minor alterations or rewording. To address this, we introduce EvoGrad, an open-source platform that harnesses a human-in-the-loop approach to create a dynamic dataset tailored to such altered WSC instances. Leveraging ChatGPT's capabilities, we expand our task instances from 182 to 3,691, setting a new benchmark for diverse common-sense reasoning datasets. Additionally, we introduce the error depth metric, assessing model stability in dynamic tasks. Our results emphasize the challenge posed by EvoGrad: Even the best performing LLM, GPT-3.5, achieves an accuracy of 65.0% with an average error depth of 7.2, a stark contrast to human performance of 92. 8% accuracy without perturbation errors. This highlights ongoing model limitations and the value of dynamic datasets in uncovering them.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{sun2024evograd,
  title  = {EvoGrad: A Dynamic Take on the Winograd Schema Challenge with Human Adversaries},
  author = {Jing Han Sun and Ali Emami},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.13372},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13372v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.13372.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.13372)

Discussion