Should We Respect LLMs? A Cross-Lingual Study on the Influence of Prompt Politeness on LLM Performance

Ziqi Yin, Hao Wang, Kaito Horio, Daisuke Kawahara, Satoshi Sekine
2/22/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We investigate the impact of politeness levels in prompts on the performance of large language models (LLMs). Polite language in human communications often garners more compliance and effectiveness, while rudeness can cause aversion, impacting response quality. We consider that LLMs mirror human communication traits, suggesting they align with human cultural norms. We assess the impact of politeness in prompts on LLMs across English, Chinese, and Japanese tasks. We observed that impolite prompts often result in poor performance, but overly polite language does not guarantee better outcomes. The best politeness level is different according to the language. This phenomenon suggests that LLMs not only reflect human behavior but are also influenced by language, particularly in different cultural contexts. Our findings highlight the need to factor in politeness for cross-cultural natural language processing and LLM usage.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{yin2024should,
  title  = {Should We Respect LLMs? A Cross-Lingual Study on the Influence of Prompt Politeness on LLM Performance},
  author = {Ziqi Yin and Hao Wang and Kaito Horio and Daisuke Kawahara and Satoshi Sekine},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.14531},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14531v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.14531.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.14531)

Discussion