On the (In)feasibility of ML Backdoor Detection as an Hypothesis Testing Problem

Georg Pichler, Marco Romanelli, Divya Prakash Manivannan, Prashanth Krishnamurthy, Farshad Khorrami +1 more
2/26/2024
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We introduce a formal statistical definition for the problem of backdoor detection in machine learning systems and use it to analyze the feasibility of such problems, providing evidence for the utility and applicability of our definition. The main contributions of this work are an impossibility result and an achievability result for backdoor detection. We show a no-free-lunch theorem, proving that universal (adversary-unaware) backdoor detection is impossible, except for very small alphabet sizes. Thus, we argue, that backdoor detection methods need to be either explicitly, or implicitly adversary-aware. However, our work does not imply that backdoor detection cannot work in specific scenarios, as evidenced by successful backdoor detection methods in the scientific literature. Furthermore, we connect our definition to the probably approximately correct (PAC) learnability of the out-of-distribution detection problem.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{pichler2024infeasibility,
  title  = {On the (In)feasibility of ML Backdoor Detection as an Hypothesis Testing Problem},
  author = {Georg Pichler and Marco Romanelli and Divya Prakash Manivannan and Prashanth Krishnamurthy and Farshad Khorrami and Siddharth Garg},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2402.16926},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16926v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2402.16926.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2402.16926)

Discussion