PROC2PDDL: Open-Domain Planning Representations from Texts

Tianyi Zhang, Li Zhang, Zhaoyi Hou, Ziyu Wang, Yuling Gu +3 more
2/29/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Planning in a text-based environment continues to be a major challenge for AI systems. Recent approaches have used language models to predict a planning domain definition (e.g., PDDL) but have only been evaluated in closed-domain simulated environments. To address this, we present Proc2PDDL , the first dataset containing open-domain procedural texts paired with expert-annotated PDDL representations. Using this dataset, we evaluate state-of-the-art models on defining the preconditions and effects of actions. We show that Proc2PDDL is highly challenging, with GPT-3.5's success rate close to 0% and GPT-4's around 35%. Our analysis shows both syntactic and semantic errors, indicating LMs' deficiency in both generating domain-specific prgorams and reasoning about events. We hope this analysis and dataset helps future progress towards integrating the best of LMs and formal planning.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhang2024procpddl,
  title  = {PROC2PDDL: Open-Domain Planning Representations from Texts},
  author = {Tianyi Zhang and Li Zhang and Zhaoyi Hou and Ziyu Wang and Yuling Gu and Peter Clark and Chris Callison-Burch and Niket Tandon},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.00092},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00092v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.00092.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.00092)

Discussion