Prompting ChatGPT for Translation: A Comparative Analysis of Translation Brief and Persona Prompts

Sui He
2/29/2024
cs.CLcs.CYcs.HC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Prompt engineering has shown potential for improving translation quality in LLMs. However, the possibility of using translation concepts in prompt design remains largely underexplored. Against this backdrop, the current paper discusses the effectiveness of incorporating the conceptual tool of translation brief and the personas of translator and author into prompt design for translation tasks in ChatGPT. Findings suggest that, although certain elements are constructive in facilitating human-to-human communication for translation tasks, their effectiveness is limited for improving translation quality in ChatGPT. This accentuates the need for explorative research on how translation theorists and practitioners can develop the current set of conceptual tools rooted in the human-to-human communication paradigm for translation purposes in this emerging workflow involving human-machine interaction, and how translation concepts developed in translation studies can inform the training of GPT models for translation tasks.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{he2024prompting,
  title  = {Prompting ChatGPT for Translation: A Comparative Analysis of Translation Brief and Persona Prompts},
  author = {Sui He},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.00127},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00127v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.00127.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.00127)

Discussion