Formulation Comparison for Timeline Construction using LLMs

Kimihiro Hasegawa, Nikhil Kandukuri, Susan Holm, Yukari Yamakawa, Teruko Mitamura
3/1/2024
cs.CL

Official code: kimihiroh/timeset (9 stars, last commit 2024-03-05).

Abstract

Constructing a timeline requires identifying the chronological order of events in an article. In prior timeline construction datasets, temporal orders are typically annotated by either event-to-time anchoring or event-to-event pairwise ordering, both of which suffer from missing temporal information. To mitigate the issue, we develop a new evaluation dataset, TimeSET, consisting of single-document timelines with document-level order annotation. TimeSET features saliency-based event selection and partial ordering, which enable a practical annotation workload. Aiming to build better automatic timeline construction systems, we propose a novel evaluation framework to compare multiple task formulations with TimeSET by prompting open LLMs, i.e., Llama 2 and Flan-T5. Considering that identifying temporal orders of events is a core subtask in timeline construction, we further benchmark open LLMs on existing event temporal ordering datasets to gain a robust understanding of their capabilities. Our experiments show that (1) NLI formulation with Flan-T5 demonstrates a strong performance among others, while (2) timeline construction and event temporal ordering are still challenging tasks for few-shot LLMs. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/kimihiroh/timeset.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

kimihiroh/timesetOfficial100%
90Shell, PythonMar 1, 20242 years agoNOASSERTION

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hasegawa2024formulation,
  title  = {Formulation Comparison for Timeline Construction using LLMs},
  author = {Kimihiro Hasegawa and Nikhil Kandukuri and Susan Holm and Yukari Yamakawa and Teruko Mitamura},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.00990},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00990v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.00990.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.00990)

Discussion