Robustness bounds on the successful adversarial examples in probabilistic models: Implications from Gaussian processes

Hiroaki Maeshima, Akira Otsuka
3/4/2024
cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Adversarial example (AE) is an attack method for machine learning, which is crafted by adding imperceptible perturbation to the data inducing misclassification. In the current paper, we investigated the upper bound of the probability of successful AEs based on the Gaussian Process (GP) classification, a probabilistic inference model. We proved a new upper bound of the probability of a successful AE attack that depends on AE's perturbation norm, the kernel function used in GP, and the distance of the closest pair with different labels in the training dataset. Surprisingly, the upper bound is determined regardless of the distribution of the sample dataset. We showed that our theoretical result was confirmed through the experiment using ImageNet. In addition, we showed that changing the parameters of the kernel function induces a change of the upper bound of the probability of successful AEs.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{maeshima2024robustness,
  title  = {Robustness bounds on the successful adversarial examples in probabilistic models: Implications from Gaussian processes},
  author = {Hiroaki Maeshima and Akira Otsuka},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.01896},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01896v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.01896.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.01896)

Discussion