Population-aware Online Mirror Descent for Mean-Field Games by Deep Reinforcement Learning

Zida Wu, Mathieu Lauriere, Samuel Jia Cong Chua, Matthieu Geist, Olivier Pietquin +1 more
3/6/2024
cs.GTcs.LGcs.MA

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Mean Field Games (MFGs) have the ability to handle large-scale multi-agent systems, but learning Nash equilibria in MFGs remains a challenging task. In this paper, we propose a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithm that achieves population-dependent Nash equilibrium without the need for averaging or sampling from history, inspired by Munchausen RL and Online Mirror Descent. Through the design of an additional inner-loop replay buffer, the agents can effectively learn to achieve Nash equilibrium from any distribution, mitigating catastrophic forgetting. The resulting policy can be applied to various initial distributions. Numerical experiments on four canonical examples demonstrate our algorithm has better convergence properties than SOTA algorithms, in particular a DRL version of Fictitious Play for population-dependent policies.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{wu2024populationaware,
  title  = {Population-aware Online Mirror Descent for Mean-Field Games by Deep Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Zida Wu and Mathieu Lauriere and Samuel Jia Cong Chua and Matthieu Geist and Olivier Pietquin and Ankur Mehta},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.03552},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03552v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.03552.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.03552)

Discussion