Source Matters: Source Dataset Impact on Model Robustness in Medical Imaging

Dovile Juodelyte, Yucheng Lu, Amelia Jiménez-Sánchez, Sabrina Bottazzi, Enzo Ferrante +1 more
3/7/2024
cs.CVcs.LG

Official code: DovileDo/source-matters (4 stars, MIT, last commit 2024-04-08).

Abstract

Transfer learning has become an essential part of medical imaging classification algorithms, often leveraging ImageNet weights. The domain shift from natural to medical images has prompted alternatives such as RadImageNet, often showing comparable classification performance. However, it remains unclear whether the performance gains from transfer learning stem from improved generalization or shortcut learning. To address this, we conceptualize confounders by introducing the Medical Imaging Contextualized Confounder Taxonomy (MICCAT) and investigate a range of confounders across it -- whether synthetic or sampled from the data -- using two public chest X-ray and CT datasets. We show that ImageNet and RadImageNet achieve comparable classification performance, yet ImageNet is much more prone to overfitting to confounders. We recommend that researchers using ImageNet-pretrained models reexamine their model robustness by conducting similar experiments. Our code and experiments are available at https://github.com/DovileDo/source-matters.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

MIT
41Python, Jupyter NotebookMar 6, 20242 years agoMIT

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{juodelyte2024source,
  title  = {Source Matters: Source Dataset Impact on Model Robustness in Medical Imaging},
  author = {Dovile Juodelyte and Yucheng Lu and Amelia Jiménez-Sánchez and Sabrina Bottazzi and Enzo Ferrante and Veronika Cheplygina},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.04484},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04484v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.04484.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.04484)

Discussion