Denoising Autoregressive Representation Learning

Yazhe Li, Jorg Bornschein, Ting Chen
3/8/2024
cs.LGcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this paper, we explore a new generative approach for learning visual representations. Our method, DARL, employs a decoder-only Transformer to predict image patches autoregressively. We find that training with Mean Squared Error (MSE) alone leads to strong representations. To enhance the image generation ability, we replace the MSE loss with the diffusion objective by using a denoising patch decoder. We show that the learned representation can be improved by using tailored noise schedules and longer training in larger models. Notably, the optimal schedule differs significantly from the typical ones used in standard image diffusion models. Overall, despite its simple architecture, DARL delivers performance remarkably close to state-of-the-art masked prediction models under the fine-tuning protocol. This marks an important step towards a unified model capable of both visual perception and generation, effectively combining the strengths of autoregressive and denoising diffusion models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{li2024denoising,
  title  = {Denoising Autoregressive Representation Learning},
  author = {Yazhe Li and Jorg Bornschein and Ting Chen},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.05196},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05196v2},
  journal = {ICML 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.05196.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.05196)

Discussion