On Representing Electronic Wave Functions with Sign Equivariant Neural Networks

Nicholas Gao, Stephan Günnemann
3/8/2024
quant-phcs.LGphysics.chem-ph

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Recent neural networks demonstrated impressively accurate approximations of electronic ground-state wave functions. Such neural networks typically consist of a permutation-equivariant neural network followed by a permutation-antisymmetric operation to enforce the electronic exchange symmetry. While accurate, such neural networks are computationally expensive. In this work, we explore the flipped approach, where we first compute antisymmetric quantities based on the electronic coordinates and then apply sign equivariant neural networks to preserve the antisymmetry. While this approach promises acceleration thanks to the lower-dimensional representation, we demonstrate that it reduces to a Jastrow factor, a commonly used permutation-invariant multiplicative factor in the wave function. Our empirical results support this further, finding little to no improvements over baselines. We conclude with neither theoretical nor empirical advantages of sign equivariant functions for representing electronic wave functions within the evaluation of this work.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{gao2024representing,
  title  = {On Representing Electronic Wave Functions with Sign Equivariant Neural Networks},
  author = {Nicholas Gao and Stephan Günnemann},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.05249},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05249v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.05249.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.05249)

Discussion