Multiple Instance Learning with random sampling for Whole Slide Image Classification

H. Keshvarikhojasteh, J. P. W. Pluim, M. Veta
3/8/2024
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 5 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

In computational pathology, random sampling of patches during training of Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) methods is computationally efficient and serves as a regularization strategy. Despite its promising benefits, questions concerning performance trends for varying sample sizes and its influence on model interpretability remain. Addressing these, we reach an optimal performance enhancement of 1.7% using thirty percent of patches on the CAMELYON16 dataset, and 3.7% with only eight samples on the TUPAC16 dataset. We also find interpretability effects are strongly dataset-dependent, with interpretability impacted on CAMELYON16, while remaining unaffected on TUPAC16. This reinforces that both the performance and interpretability relationships with sampling are closely task-specific. End-to-end training with 1024 samples reveals improvements across both datasets compared to pre-extracted features, further highlighting the potential of this efficient approach.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 5 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{keshvarikhojasteh2024multiple,
  title  = {Multiple Instance Learning with random sampling for Whole Slide Image Classification},
  author = {H. Keshvarikhojasteh and J. P. W. Pluim and M. Veta},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.05351},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05351v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.05351.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.05351)

Discussion