Privacy Amplification for the Gaussian Mechanism via Bounded Support

Shengyuan Hu, Saeed Mahloujifar, Virginia Smith, Kamalika Chaudhuri, Chuan Guo
3/7/2024
cs.CRcs.LG

No official code found. Best implementation: facebookresearch/bounded_gaussian_mechanism (7 stars, last commit 2024-03-18).

Abstract

Data-dependent privacy accounting frameworks such as per-instance differential privacy (pDP) and Fisher information loss (FIL) confer fine-grained privacy guarantees for individuals in a fixed training dataset. These guarantees can be desirable compared to vanilla DP in real world settings as they tightly upper-bound the privacy leakage for a $\textit{specific}$ individual in an $\textit{actual}$ dataset, rather than considering worst-case datasets. While these frameworks are beginning to gain popularity, to date, there is a lack of private mechanisms that can fully leverage advantages of data-dependent accounting. To bridge this gap, we propose simple modifications of the Gaussian mechanism with bounded support, showing that they amplify privacy guarantees under data-dependent accounting. Experiments on model training with DP-SGD show that using bounded support Gaussian mechanisms can provide a reduction of the pDP bound $ε$ by as much as 30% without negative effects on model utility.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Repo for the project "Privacy Amplification for the Gaussian Mechanism via Bounded Support"

70PythonMar 8, 20242 years agoNOASSERTION

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hu2024privacy,
  title  = {Privacy Amplification for the Gaussian Mechanism via Bounded Support},
  author = {Shengyuan Hu and Saeed Mahloujifar and Virginia Smith and Kamalika Chaudhuri and Chuan Guo},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.05598},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05598v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.05598.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.05598)

Discussion