Imbalance-aware Presence-only Loss Function for Species Distribution Modeling

Robin Zbinden, Nina van Tiel, Marc Rußwurm, Devis Tuia
3/12/2024
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In the face of significant biodiversity decline, species distribution models (SDMs) are essential for understanding the impact of climate change on species habitats by connecting environmental conditions to species occurrences. Traditionally limited by a scarcity of species observations, these models have significantly improved in performance through the integration of larger datasets provided by citizen science initiatives. However, they still suffer from the strong class imbalance between species within these datasets, often resulting in the penalization of rare species--those most critical for conservation efforts. To tackle this issue, this study assesses the effectiveness of training deep learning models using a balanced presence-only loss function on large citizen science-based datasets. We demonstrate that this imbalance-aware loss function outperforms traditional loss functions across various datasets and tasks, particularly in accurately modeling rare species with limited observations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zbinden2024imbalanceaware,
  title  = {Imbalance-aware Presence-only Loss Function for Species Distribution Modeling},
  author = {Robin Zbinden and Nina van Tiel and Marc Rußwurm and Devis Tuia},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.07472},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07472v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.07472.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.07472)

Discussion