SIFiD: Reassess Summary Factual Inconsistency Detection with LLM

Jiuding Yang, Hui Liu, Weidong Guo, Zhuwei Rao, Yu Xu +1 more
3/12/2024
cs.CLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Ensuring factual consistency between the summary and the original document is paramount in summarization tasks. Consequently, considerable effort has been dedicated to detecting inconsistencies. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs), recent studies have begun to leverage their advanced language understanding capabilities for inconsistency detection. However, early attempts have shown that LLMs underperform traditional models due to their limited ability to follow instructions and the absence of an effective detection methodology. In this study, we reassess summary inconsistency detection with LLMs, comparing the performances of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. To advance research in LLM-based inconsistency detection, we propose SIFiD (Summary Inconsistency Detection with Filtered Document) that identify key sentences within documents by either employing natural language inference or measuring semantic similarity between summaries and documents.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{yang2024sifid,
  title  = {SIFiD: Reassess Summary Factual Inconsistency Detection with LLM},
  author = {Jiuding Yang and Hui Liu and Weidong Guo and Zhuwei Rao and Yu Xu and Di Niu},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.07557},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07557v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.07557.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.07557)

Discussion