MoleculeQA: A Dataset to Evaluate Factual Accuracy in Molecular Comprehension

Xingyu Lu, He Cao, Zijing Liu, Shengyuan Bai, Leqing Chen +3 more
3/13/2024
cs.CLq-bio.BM

No official code found. Best implementation: IDEA-XL/MoleculeQA (4 stars, last commit 2024-11-26).

Abstract

Large language models are playing an increasingly significant role in molecular research, yet existing models often generate erroneous information, posing challenges to accurate molecular comprehension. Traditional evaluation metrics for generated content fail to assess a model's accuracy in molecular understanding. To rectify the absence of factual evaluation, we present MoleculeQA, a novel question answering (QA) dataset which possesses 62K QA pairs over 23K molecules. Each QA pair, composed of a manual question, a positive option and three negative options, has consistent semantics with a molecular description from authoritative molecular corpus. MoleculeQA is not only the first benchmark for molecular factual bias evaluation but also the largest QA dataset for molecular research. A comprehensive evaluation on MoleculeQA for existing molecular LLMs exposes their deficiencies in specific areas and pinpoints several particularly crucial factors for molecular understanding.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

IDEA-XL/MoleculeQACommunity100%

The largest existing Question Answering Dataset for molecular research. [EMNLP 2024]

40Mar 13, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{lu2024moleculeqa,
  title  = {MoleculeQA: A Dataset to Evaluate Factual Accuracy in Molecular Comprehension},
  author = {Xingyu Lu and He Cao and Zijing Liu and Shengyuan Bai and Leqing Chen and Yuan Yao and Hai-Tao Zheng and Yu Li},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.08192},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08192v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.08192.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.08192)

Discussion