How do Machine Learning Projects use Continuous Integration Practices? An Empirical Study on GitHub Actions

João Helis Bernardo, Daniel Alencar da Costa, Sérgio Queiroz de Medeiros, Uirá Kulesza
3/14/2024
cs.SEcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Continuous Integration (CI) is a well-established practice in traditional software development, but its nuances in the domain of Machine Learning (ML) projects remain relatively unexplored. Given the distinctive nature of ML development, understanding how CI practices are adopted in this context is crucial for tailoring effective approaches. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of 185 open-source projects on GitHub (93 ML and 92 non-ML projects). Our investigation comprises both quantitative and qualitative dimensions, aiming to uncover differences in CI adoption between ML and non-ML projects. Our findings indicate that ML projects often require longer build durations, and medium-sized ML projects exhibit lower test coverage compared to non-ML projects. Moreover, small and medium-sized ML projects show a higher prevalence of increasing build duration trends compared to their non-ML counterparts. Additionally, our qualitative analysis illuminates the discussions around CI in both ML and non-ML projects, encompassing themes like CI Build Execution and Status, CI Testing, and CI Infrastructure. These insights shed light on the unique challenges faced by ML projects in adopting CI practices effectively.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bernardo2024machine,
  title  = {How do Machine Learning Projects use Continuous Integration Practices? An Empirical Study on GitHub Actions},
  author = {João Helis Bernardo and Daniel Alencar da Costa and Sérgio Queiroz de Medeiros and Uirá Kulesza},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.09547},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.09547v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.09547.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.09547)

Discussion