Barely Random Algorithms and Collective Metrical Task Systems

Romain Cosson, Laurent Massouli'e
2/3/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We consider metrical task systems on general metric spaces with $n$ points, and show that any fully randomized algorithm can be turned into a randomized algorithm that uses only $2\log n$ random bits, and achieves the same competitive ratio up to a factor $2$. This provides the first order-optimal barely random algorithms for metrical task systems, i.e., which use a number of random bits that does not depend on the number of requests addressed to the system. We discuss implications on various aspects of online decision-making such as: distributed systems, advice complexity, and transaction costs, suggesting broad applicability. We put forward an equivalent view that we call collective metrical task systems where $k$ agents in a metrical task system team up, and suffer the average cost paid by each agent. Our results imply that such a team can be $O(\log^2 n)$-competitive as soon as $k\geq n^2$. In comparison, a single agent is always $\Omega(n)$-competitive.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{cosson2026barely,
  title  = {Barely Random Algorithms and Collective Metrical Task Systems},
  author = {Romain Cosson and Laurent Massouli'e},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2403.11267},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  doi    = {10.52202/079017-1178},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11267},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2024 2024}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.11267.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.11267)

Discussion