State space representations of the Roesser type for convolutional layers

Patricia Pauli, Dennis Gramlich, Frank Allgöwer
3/18/2024
eess.SYcs.LGeess.IV

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

From the perspective of control theory, convolutional layers (of neural networks) are 2-D (or N-D) linear time-invariant dynamical systems. The usual representation of convolutional layers by the convolution kernel corresponds to the representation of a dynamical system by its impulse response. However, many analysis tools from control theory, e.g., involving linear matrix inequalities, require a state space representation. For this reason, we explicitly provide a state space representation of the Roesser type for 2-D convolutional layers with $c_\mathrm{in}r_1 + c_\mathrm{out}r_2$ states, where $c_\mathrm{in}$/$c_\mathrm{out}$ is the number of input/output channels of the layer and $r_1$/$r_2$ characterizes the width/length of the convolution kernel. This representation is shown to be minimal for $c_\mathrm{in} = c_\mathrm{out}$. We further construct state space representations for dilated, strided, and N-D convolutions.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{pauli2024state,
  title  = {State space representations of the Roesser type for convolutional layers},
  author = {Patricia Pauli and Dennis Gramlich and Frank Allgöwer},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.11938},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11938v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.11938.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.11938)

Discussion