Safety Analysis of Autonomous Railway Systems: An Introduction to the SACRED Methodology

Josh Hunter, John McDermid, Simon Burton
3/18/2024
cs.SEcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

As the railway industry increasingly seeks to introduce autonomy and machine learning (ML), several questions arise. How can safety be assured for such systems and technologies? What is the applicability of current safety standards within this new technological landscape? What are the key metrics to classify a system as safe? Currently, safety analysis for the railway reflects the failure modes of existing technology; in contrast, the primary concern of analysis of automation is typically average performance. Such purely statistical approaches to measuring ML performance are limited, as they may overlook classes of situations that may occur rarely but in which the function performs consistently poorly. To combat these difficulties we introduce SACRED, a safety methodology for producing an initial safety case and determining important safety metrics for autonomous systems. The development of SACRED is motivated by the proposed GoA-4 light-rail system in Berlin.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hunter2024safety,
  title  = {Safety Analysis of Autonomous Railway Systems: An Introduction to the SACRED Methodology},
  author = {Josh Hunter and John McDermid and Simon Burton},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.12114},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12114v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.12114.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.12114)

Discussion