Probabilistic Circuits with Constraints via Convex Optimization

Soroush Ghandi, Benjamin Quost, Cassio de Campos
3/19/2024
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This work addresses integrating probabilistic propositional logic constraints into the distribution encoded by a probabilistic circuit (PC). PCs are a class of tractable models that allow efficient computations (such as conditional and marginal probabilities) while achieving state-of-the-art performance in some domains. The proposed approach takes both a PC and constraints as inputs, and outputs a new PC that satisfies the constraints. This is done efficiently via convex optimization without the need to retrain the entire model. Empirical evaluations indicate that the combination of constraints and PCs can have multiple use cases, including the improvement of model performance under scarce or incomplete data, as well as the enforcement of machine learning fairness measures into the model without compromising model fitness. We believe that these ideas will open possibilities for multiple other applications involving the combination of logics and deep probabilistic models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ghandi2024probabilistic,
  title  = {Probabilistic Circuits with Constraints via Convex Optimization},
  author = {Soroush Ghandi and Benjamin Quost and Cassio de Campos},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.13125},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13125v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.13125.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.13125)

Discussion