A Technological Perspective on Misuse of Available AI

Lukas Pöhler, Valentin Schrader, Alexander Ladwein, Florian von Keller
3/22/2024
cs.CYcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Potential malicious misuse of civilian artificial intelligence (AI) poses serious threats to security on a national and international level. Besides defining autonomous systems from a technological viewpoint and explaining how AI development is characterized, we show how already existing and openly available AI technology could be misused. To underline this, we developed three exemplary use cases of potentially misused AI that threaten political, digital and physical security. The use cases can be built from existing AI technologies and components from academia, the private sector and the developer-community. This shows how freely available AI can be combined into autonomous weapon systems. Based on the use cases, we deduce points of control and further measures to prevent the potential threat through misused AI. Further, we promote the consideration of malicious misuse of civilian AI systems in the discussion on autonomous weapon systems (AWS).

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{phler2024technological,
  title  = {A Technological Perspective on Misuse of Available AI},
  author = {Lukas Pöhler and Valentin Schrader and Alexander Ladwein and Florian von Keller},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.15325},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15325v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.15325.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.15325)

Discussion