Uncertainty Quantification for Gradient-based Explanations in Neural Networks

Mihir Mulye, Matias Valdenegro-Toro
3/25/2024
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Explanation methods help understand the reasons for a model's prediction. These methods are increasingly involved in model debugging, performance optimization, and gaining insights into the workings of a model. With such critical applications of these methods, it is imperative to measure the uncertainty associated with the explanations generated by these methods. In this paper, we propose a pipeline to ascertain the explanation uncertainty of neural networks by combining uncertainty estimation methods and explanation methods. We use this pipeline to produce explanation distributions for the CIFAR-10, FER+, and California Housing datasets. By computing the coefficient of variation of these distributions, we evaluate the confidence in the explanation and determine that the explanations generated using Guided Backpropagation have low uncertainty associated with them. Additionally, we compute modified pixel insertion/deletion metrics to evaluate the quality of the generated explanations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mulye2024uncertainty,
  title  = {Uncertainty Quantification for Gradient-based Explanations in Neural Networks},
  author = {Mihir Mulye and Matias Valdenegro-Toro},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.17224},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17224v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.17224.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.17224)

Discussion