Constructions Are So Difficult That Even Large Language Models Get Them Right for the Wrong Reasons

Shijia Zhou, Leonie Weissweiler, Taiqi He, Hinrich Schütze, David R. Mortensen +1 more
3/26/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In this paper, we make a contribution that can be understood from two perspectives: from an NLP perspective, we introduce a small challenge dataset for NLI with large lexical overlap, which minimises the possibility of models discerning entailment solely based on token distinctions, and show that GPT-4 and Llama 2 fail it with strong bias. We then create further challenging sub-tasks in an effort to explain this failure. From a Computational Linguistics perspective, we identify a group of constructions with three classes of adjectives which cannot be distinguished by surface features. This enables us to probe for LLM's understanding of these constructions in various ways, and we find that they fail in a variety of ways to distinguish between them, suggesting that they don't adequately represent their meaning or capture the lexical properties of phrasal heads.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhou2024constructions,
  title  = {Constructions Are So Difficult That Even Large Language Models Get Them Right for the Wrong Reasons},
  author = {Shijia Zhou and Leonie Weissweiler and Taiqi He and Hinrich Schütze and David R. Mortensen and Lori Levin},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.17760},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17760v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.17760.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.17760)

Discussion