Measuring Political Bias in Large Language Models: What Is Said and How It Is Said

Yejin Bang, Delong Chen, Nayeon Lee, Pascale Fung
3/27/2024
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

We propose to measure political bias in LLMs by analyzing both the content and style of their generated content regarding political issues. Existing benchmarks and measures focus on gender and racial biases. However, political bias exists in LLMs and can lead to polarization and other harms in downstream applications. In order to provide transparency to users, we advocate that there should be fine-grained and explainable measures of political biases generated by LLMs. Our proposed measure looks at different political issues such as reproductive rights and climate change, at both the content (the substance of the generation) and the style (the lexical polarity) of such bias. We measured the political bias in eleven open-sourced LLMs and showed that our proposed framework is easily scalable to other topics and is explainable.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bang2024measuring,
  title  = {Measuring Political Bias in Large Language Models: What Is Said and How It Is Said},
  author = {Yejin Bang and Delong Chen and Nayeon Lee and Pascale Fung},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2403.18932},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18932v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2403.18932.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2403.18932)

Discussion