Your Co-Workers Matter: Evaluating Collaborative Capabilities of Language Models in Blocks World

Guande Wu, Chen Zhao, Claudio Silva, He He
3/30/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.HC

No official code found. Best implementation: jnzs1836/coblock (2 stars, last commit 2024-11-04).

Abstract

Language agents that interact with the world on their own have great potential for automating digital tasks. While large language model (LLM) agents have made progress in understanding and executing tasks such as textual games and webpage control, many real-world tasks also require collaboration with humans or other LLMs in equal roles, which involves intent understanding, task coordination, and communication. To test LLM's ability to collaborate, we design a blocks-world environment, where two agents, each having unique goals and skills, build a target structure together. To complete the goals, they can act in the world and communicate in natural language. Under this environment, we design increasingly challenging settings to evaluate different collaboration perspectives, from independent to more complex, dependent tasks. We further adopt chain-of-thought prompts that include intermediate reasoning steps to model the partner's state and identify and correct execution errors. Both human-machine and machine-machine experiments show that LLM agents have strong grounding capacities, and our approach significantly improves the evaluation metric.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

jnzs1836/coblockCommunity100%
20CSS, HTMLMar 25, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wu2024your,
  title  = {Your Co-Workers Matter: Evaluating Collaborative Capabilities of Language Models in Blocks World},
  author = {Guande Wu and Chen Zhao and Claudio Silva and He He},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.00246},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00246v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.00246.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.00246)

Discussion