LLM-RadJudge: Achieving Radiologist-Level Evaluation for X-Ray Report Generation

Zilong Wang, Xufang Luo, Xinyang Jiang, Dongsheng Li, Lili Qiu
4/1/2024
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Evaluating generated radiology reports is crucial for the development of radiology AI, but existing metrics fail to reflect the task's clinical requirements. This study proposes a novel evaluation framework using large language models (LLMs) to compare radiology reports for assessment. We compare the performance of various LLMs and demonstrate that, when using GPT-4, our proposed metric achieves evaluation consistency close to that of radiologists. Furthermore, to reduce costs and improve accessibility, making this method practical, we construct a dataset using LLM evaluation results and perform knowledge distillation to train a smaller model. The distilled model achieves evaluation capabilities comparable to GPT-4. Our framework and distilled model offer an accessible and efficient evaluation method for radiology report generation, facilitating the development of more clinically relevant models. The model will be further open-sourced and accessible.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2024llmradjudge,
  title  = {LLM-RadJudge: Achieving Radiologist-Level Evaluation for X-Ray Report Generation},
  author = {Zilong Wang and Xufang Luo and Xinyang Jiang and Dongsheng Li and Lili Qiu},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.00998},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00998v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.00998.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.00998)

Discussion