Do LLMs Find Human Answers To Fact-Driven Questions Perplexing? A Case Study on Reddit

Parker Seegmiller, Joseph Gatto, Omar Sharif, Madhusudan Basak, Sarah Masud Preum
4/1/2024
cs.CLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have been shown to be proficient in correctly answering questions in the context of online discourse. However, the study of using LLMs to model human-like answers to fact-driven social media questions is still under-explored. In this work, we investigate how LLMs model the wide variety of human answers to fact-driven questions posed on several topic-specific Reddit communities, or subreddits. We collect and release a dataset of 409 fact-driven questions and 7,534 diverse, human-rated answers from 15 r/Ask{Topic} communities across 3 categories: profession, social identity, and geographic location. We find that LLMs are considerably better at modeling highly-rated human answers to such questions, as opposed to poorly-rated human answers. We present several directions for future research based on our initial findings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{seegmiller2024llms,
  title  = {Do LLMs Find Human Answers To Fact-Driven Questions Perplexing? A Case Study on Reddit},
  author = {Parker Seegmiller and Joseph Gatto and Omar Sharif and Madhusudan Basak and Sarah Masud Preum},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.01147},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01147v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.01147.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.01147)

Discussion