Rematch: Robust and Efficient Matching of Local Knowledge Graphs to Improve Structural and Semantic Similarity

Zoher Kachwala, Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Filippo Menczer
4/2/2024
cs.CLcs.IR

No official code found. Best implementation: Zoher15/Rematch-RARE (3 stars, last commit 2025-06-26).

Abstract

Knowledge graphs play a pivotal role in various applications, such as question-answering and fact-checking. Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) represents text as knowledge graphs. Evaluating the quality of these graphs involves matching them structurally to each other and semantically to the source text. Existing AMR metrics are inefficient and struggle to capture semantic similarity. We also lack a systematic evaluation benchmark for assessing structural similarity between AMR graphs. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a novel AMR similarity metric, rematch, alongside a new evaluation for structural similarity called RARE. Among state-of-the-art metrics, rematch ranks second in structural similarity; and first in semantic similarity by 1--5 percentage points on the STS-B and SICK-R benchmarks. Rematch is also five times faster than the next most efficient metric.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Rematch: Robust and Efficient Matching of Local Knowledge Graphs for Improved Structural and Semantic Similarity

31Perl, ShellJan 17, 20241 years ago
abstract-meaning-representationsamrgraph-isomorphismgraph-matchingknowledge-graphs+3 more

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kachwala2024rematch,
  title  = {Rematch: Robust and Efficient Matching of Local Knowledge Graphs to Improve Structural and Semantic Similarity},
  author = {Zoher Kachwala and Jisun An and Haewoon Kwak and Filippo Menczer},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.02126},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02126v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.02126.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.02126)

Discussion