Concept -- An Evaluation Protocol on Conversational Recommender Systems with System-centric and User-centric Factors

Chen Huang, Peixin Qin, Yang Deng, Wenqiang Lei, Jiancheng Lv +1 more
4/4/2024
cs.CLcs.AI

No official code found. Best implementation: huangzichun/Concept4CRS (3 stars, last commit 2025-02-18).

Abstract

The conversational recommendation system (CRS) has been criticized regarding its user experience in real-world scenarios, despite recent significant progress achieved in academia. Existing evaluation protocols for CRS may prioritize system-centric factors such as effectiveness and fluency in conversation while neglecting user-centric aspects. Thus, we propose a new and inclusive evaluation protocol, Concept, which integrates both system- and user-centric factors. We conceptualise three key characteristics in representing such factors and further divide them into six primary abilities. To implement Concept, we adopt a LLM-based user simulator and evaluator with scoring rubrics that are tailored for each primary ability. Our protocol, Concept, serves a dual purpose. First, it provides an overview of the pros and cons in current CRS models. Second, it pinpoints the problem of low usability in the "omnipotent" ChatGPT and offers a comprehensive reference guide for evaluating CRS, thereby setting the foundation for CRS improvement.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

31Shell, PythonApr 30, 20241 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{huang2024concept,
  title  = {Concept -- An Evaluation Protocol on Conversational Recommender Systems with System-centric and User-centric Factors},
  author = {Chen Huang and Peixin Qin and Yang Deng and Wenqiang Lei and Jiancheng Lv and Tat-Seng Chua},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.03304},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03304v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.03304.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.03304)

Discussion