Iterative Refinement Strategy for Automated Data Labeling: Facial Landmark Diagnosis in Medical Imaging

Yu-Hsi Chen
4/8/2024
cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Automated data labeling techniques are crucial for accelerating the development of deep learning models, particularly in complex medical imaging applications. However, ensuring accuracy and efficiency remains challenging. This paper presents iterative refinement strategies for automated data labeling in facial landmark diagnosis to enhance accuracy and efficiency for deep learning models in medical applications, including dermatology, plastic surgery, and ophthalmology. Leveraging feedback mechanisms and advanced algorithms, our approach iteratively refines initial labels, reducing reliance on manual intervention while improving label quality. Through empirical evaluation and case studies, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed strategies in deep learning tasks across medical imaging domains. Our results highlight the importance of iterative refinement in automated data labeling to enhance the capabilities of deep learning systems in medical imaging applications.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chen2024iterative,
  title  = {Iterative Refinement Strategy for Automated Data Labeling: Facial Landmark Diagnosis in Medical Imaging},
  author = {Yu-Hsi Chen},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.05348},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05348v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.05348.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.05348)

Discussion