Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?

Mingmeng Geng, Roberto Trotta
4/12/2024
cs.CLcs.AIcs.DL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Based on one million arXiv papers submitted from May 2018 to January 2024, we assess the textual density of ChatGPT's writing style in their abstracts through a statistical analysis of word frequency changes. Our model is calibrated and validated on a mixture of real abstracts and ChatGPT-modified abstracts (simulated data) after a careful noise analysis. The words used for estimation are not fixed but adaptive, including those with decreasing frequency. We find that large language models (LLMs), represented by ChatGPT, are having an increasing impact on arXiv abstracts, especially in the field of computer science, where the fraction of LLM-style abstracts is estimated to be approximately 35%, if we take the responses of GPT-3.5 to one simple prompt, "revise the following sentences", as a baseline. We conclude with an analysis of both positive and negative aspects of the penetration of LLMs into academics' writing style.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{geng2024chatgpt,
  title  = {Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?},
  author = {Mingmeng Geng and Roberto Trotta},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2404.08627},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08627v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2404.08627.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2404.08627)

Discussion